HUMAN
ECOLOGY: Ecosystem-Based and Actor/Actress-Based Models
by
Antonio C. Antonio
February
3, 2013
DEFINITION
OF TERMS:
·
Human Ecology – refers to
the study of human behavior and actions within ecosystems.
·
Ecosystem-based Model of
Human Ecology – the model that assumes that human populations, as collective
units, shape their behavior according to how they might best survive in an
ecosystem; and that eventually human populations living in unlike ecosystems will
develop cultural traits which, in themselves and their particular combinations,
would constitute the best strategy for populations to survive in its ecosystem.
·
Actor/Actress-based Model
of Human Ecology – refers to behavior, as culture, is viewed as the
accumulation of individual choices on how to behave in an environment in order
to survive and to improve one’s quality of life.
To
best explain the Ecosystem-based Model of Human Ecology, I have chosen
prisoners or ex-convicts as examples.
They live in confinement, eat the same food and are subjected to the
same prison rules and regulations even if they are there for a variety of
reasons. These reasons, however, are not
of the ordinary genre as they may range from murder and rape to petty-ordinary
crimes. But no matter what sort of
offense they have committed against society, they are still there sharing the
same environment separated from the rest of the populace.
This
segregation from the rest of society, in time, creates a unique culture such as
sporting/wearing of tattoos for example.
To an inmate, a tattoo is a measure of survival in this particular
environment as it: (a) Primarily identifies an him with a particular group
inside the penitentiary; and (b) Declares his particular position in the
group’s hierarchy. To most inmates
though, a tattoo represents some degree of protection from predatory factors
(other groups and prison guards as well) inside the prison. Depending on the dominance of a particular
group an inmate signs up with, identification to a particular group or gang
gives an inmate a sense of security. He
stands a better chance of surviving his prison term than being a loner in
prison. A shorter prison term does not
guarantee survival though. Notable among
these groups or gangs are: (1) Sige-Sige Sputnik, (2) Bahala Na, (3) Batang
City Jail, etc… not to mention “Gangnam”?
Aside
from sporting the same brand (tattoo), a particular gang also acts in a
particular way. They often have an
identifiable hand shake, demeanor and speak/communicate in a distinct language
only members of the members of gang understand.
They also live by codes of conduct, often secret, as a means to protect
each other from prison authorities and other gangs as well.
Wearing
a tattoo and joining a gang is a behavioral factor influenced by an extreme
“dog-eat-dog” situation… either you are “with them” or you are dead. This situation, however, supports both the
Rappaport’s and Rambo’s concepts of Human Ecology. This may be an inappropriate term but even inmates
strive for “quality of life” in prison.
Their quality of life will largely be influenced by the tattoo they
wear.
As
Actors/Actresses in an environment, individuals make personal choices on how to
adapt to the environment and they will either succeed or fail in their
choices. Successful choices are
eventually adopted by others in the group and they may develop into a behavior
of the group itself. Failed strategies
do not get adopted by others and they may end up becoming taboo in the
group. Consequently, culture would be the
collection of individual adaptive strategies in a group, in the case of
successful ones, others in the group have adopted, and in the case of failed
ones, the group has discouraged others from adopting.
Traditionally,
tattoos or people wearing tattoos are purely identified as ex-convicts. Anyone wearing a tattoo of whatever design is
automatically labeled as an ex-convict.
In fact, businessmen in the 1960 were uneasy in employing people with
tattoos. Lately, however, wearing
tattoos is a fashion statement… gone are the days when convenient labels (of
being ex-convicts) are given to people with tattoos. Although people wearing tattoos are still a
minority, wearing one does not necessarily mean you offended society before.
Tattoo
may have significant relevance and meaning inside a prison. In the “outside” world, however, sporting
tattoos is acceptable and is left primarily to individual choice nowadays. The Actor/Actress-based Model of Human
Ecology has a lot to do with this behavior.
Having a tattoo is simply an individual choice. Whether it is right or wrong hardly makes any
difference anymore. To the people who
like tattoos, they are left to their devices and not condemned for their
choice… and to a certain degree becomes acceptable behavior and culture. On the other hand, those who do not like
tattoos, choose to ignore them and brush them off as fads and fashion
statements. And because of the seemingly
permissive nature of modern society, such behavior eventually becomes ordinary
and acceptable.
Just my little thoughts…
(Visit,
like and share Pro EARTH Crusaders and Landscape Ecology UPOU or follow me at
antonantonio.blogspot.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment