A
TWISTED SENSE OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
by
Antonio C. Antonio
July
5, 2014
Man
is just about the only creature on earth who cuts trees, make paper out of
them, then writes “Save the Trees” on the paper. Ironic, isn’t it?
Most
of us have noticed that a lot of supermarkets and grocery stores have started
to use paper bags instead of plastic bags.
Others even come up with notices encouraging their loyal patrons to
bring their own bags so that they are not charged for the paper bag. But when asked why they suddenly shifted from
plastic to paper bags, they would say that it has been decreed by the Local
Government Unit (LGU) through a municipal or city ordinance that required them
to refrain from using plastic bags.
The
LGUs should be commended for finally caring for the environment… at least in
the field of solid waste management and flood control. It should be noted that flooding, especially
in Metro Manila, is generally caused by too much non-biodegradable waste in
waterways. Regulating the use of plastic
bags is a worthy endeavour. However,
when asked about the sustainability of banning the plastic bag and the added
pressure on forest and timber resources, they seemed not to care or understand
the environmental issues involved. It
becomes apparent that ordinances are designed and implemented solely for
political purposes… therefore, whatever is popular and could earn politician
advantages in the next election is the only consideration.
In
the previous paragraph, I mentioned “sustainability” of the use of paper bags
and “added pressure” on forest and timber products. In the seemingly myopic views of the LGUs and
their sitting political lords, this is a non-issue so long as their “ban
plastic bags” project endeared them to the voters. They would not care less if this local
government measure created some other environmental problem. Understanding the repercussions of our
actions should also be considered. Not
wanting to sound cynical (meaning: a belief that politicians are people who are
generally selfish and dishonest) or like a prophet of doom, there has to be a
middle ground in promoting the use of forest products vis-à-vis banning plastic
products. Forest and timber products are
renewable resources but the production (or specifically the “growing” time) is
quite long… at least 8 to 10 years for softwood species that are used in
processing paper.
If
paper bags are better environmentally friendly products over plastic bags, so
be it. But we should also realize that
the bigger problem is how to create a sustainable supply chain of raw materials
that nature provides and consumer products.
Equally important is a steady supply of raw materials (therefore, trees)
to fuel the demand for consumer goods (therefore, paper). There should be a little bit more dynamism in
institutionalizing plans and programs… perhaps, a longer and wider-ranged
consideration of other factors involved such as (a) tree plantation
establishment, (b) reforestation, (c) establishing a network to gather
reclyclable materials, (d) reuse, recycling and re-processing of used paper,
etc. which will ease the pressure on the existing forests. There really is more to just simple
“utilization” of our natural resources. Unfortunately,
the LGUs are silent on these or, perhaps, simply do not care.
It’s
just utterly sad when LGUs together with their popular executives postulate
ordinances that are (in truth) very short-sighted. They make so much noise about caring for the
environment without realizing that caring for Mother Earth cannot be used as a
political punchline… or this simply becomes a twisted sense of righteousness.
Just
my little thoughts…
(Please
visit, like and share Pro EARTH Crusaders and Landscape Ecology UPOU on
Facebook or follow me at antonantonio.blogspot.com.)
No comments:
Post a Comment