PUBLIC POLICY AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
by Antonio C. Antonio
September 24, 2013
“Public Policy and Public Participation Engaging Citizens and Community
in the Development of Public Policy” (link: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/canada/regions/atlantic/pdf/pub_policy_partic_e.pdf) is a very
interesting article. It has the most
comprehensive definition, classification and analysis of what Public Policy is
all about. Please allow me to highlight
some salient features of the article while adding my little comments and other
relevant information supportive of the article:
INCREASED AWARENESS –
Public Policy planning, with the increased awareness of the actual stakeholders
and civil society, has become more complex and dynamic. Our awakening to participatory democracy was
triggered by the EDSA Revolution of 1986 and the institutionalization of the
principle of “people empowerment” by the Fidel V. Ramos administration. The awareness level and desire to get
involved has increased further with the “daang matuwid” tagline of the present
administration… which has given rise to civil society’s wish to get more
involved in crafting Public Policy on a traditional ill of governance: Graft
and Corruption. Inclusion of the
citizenry and civil society in crafting Public Policies has become a “must.”
INCREASED
PARTICIPATION – The article mentioned, as a natural order of things, the
eventual increase in the level of participation of the citizens and
stakeholders. It also emphasizes on the
social and economic inclusion of all members of society. The EDSA Revolution, people empowerment and
“daang matuwid”, as Public Policy statements, not only increased the level of
awareness in Public Policy processes but also increased the want and desire of
the stakeholders to participate in crafting Public Policies.
EXPANSION OF PUBLIC
POLICY COVERAGE – The definition and extensive use of terms such as: (1)
Collaboration; (2) Community; (3) Horizontal Issues; (4) Interest Group; (5)
Policy Analysis; (6) Policy Community/Policy Network; (7) Public Consultation;
(8) Public Participation; (9) Stakeholder; and, (10) Public Policy itself seem
to indicate that the article recommends the encouragement of a wider field of
coverage of issues and a more structured approach in the formulation of Public
Policy. Our political structure brought
about by the Local Government Code, encourages participatory governance.
Local Government Units (LGU) were given more autonomy and latitude in
identifying issues and concerns of their respective constituency. This
gives impetus to a “bottom – up” direction in the transmittal of Public Policy
issues and concerns.
ENGAGING
PROFESSIONALS – The article recommends the inclusion of program managers and
consultants, planners, researchers, communication specialists, policy analysts,
and advisors. Professionalizing the ranks is a most welcomed idea… they
are most knowledgeable in this particular undertaking. I could only add
another item… the academe. Often,
perspectives from the academe are pure in their adherence to theoretical
principles that (sometimes) are being overlooked in the name of professional
expediency (… the regard for what is advantageous rather than what is right).
RETOOLING PUBLIC
SERVANTS – The article emphasizes a big picture/systems view; the need for
public servants to work for the broader public interest; and understanding of
the processes and techniques of both policy development and public
participation; and the commitment and skills needed to collaborate with other
government agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGO), stakeholders and
citizens. Enlisting the support and participation of the professionals
should also be a measure to retool public servants... it’s an opportunity for
public servants to imbibe the work ethics of professionals. When parallel
lines are drawn between public servants (people working for government) and
private sector employees, the difference will always be in the field of
efficiency. Retooling “less efficient” public servants to be at par with
the private sector is, therefore, critical if they are to “gel” with the “more
efficient” professionals. This could come in the form of additional and
public policy-focused training programs, seminars, symposia, fora, etc.
EDUCATING THE
CITIZENRY AND STAKEHOLDERS – The article made numerous references to the
participation of the citizenry and stakeholders in the development of Public
Policy. But this should be an educated participation and
contribution. Stakeholders will only find themselves “wasted” on the
wayside simply because they cannot cope with the discussions and participate
intelligently. Some degree of education should also be provided to a
representative segment from the stakeholders. They, in turn, could
cascade these information to the people in their respective communities.
COMMUNICATING PUBLIC
POLICY – This should go hand-in-hand with educating the citizenry and
stakeholders. The inclusion of professionals, the academe, civil society
and better tooled public servants will not at all be sufficient. The
ultimate beneficiaries of sound Public Policy are the citizens and
stakeholders. It will be ideal if, in all stages and phases in developing
Public Policy, they are in the loop. Transparency is very important in
this undertaking even when Public Policy development is often contemptuous and
laced with bickering. This will foster better understanding between
policy makers and policy beneficiaries.
Just my little thoughts…
No comments:
Post a Comment