INDUSTRIALIZATION
AND GOVERNANCE
by Antonio
C. Antonio
June 27,
2013
“There
are some groups who believe that industrialization is bad and insist that IP's (indigenous
peoples) and tribal communities are subjugated by the central government
against their will. Is there a basis for
that and will it be more beneficial for the community or the country if we go
back to the old system?” (Renato A. Folledo, Jr., June 19, 2013)
Progress
is the aspiration of any government and country. A lot of people even insist
that industrialization is the way to go. But from a purely agricultural
economy, industrialization must be approached carefully. While
industrialization means jobs, employment, livelihood, business and a lot of
affordable conveniences, agriculture means food and life. Our growing
population must be sustained and agriculture, not industry, can provide food
security for the population.
Industrialization
should form part of our future programs… but must also be calibrated to
preserve our culture as a people. The indigenous people (IP) are the only
remaining segment in our society who are culturally pure and have managed to
remain untouched by industrialization. It does not mean though that the
IPs should be left alone in their stone-age systems. But subjugation,
meaning: controlling and conquering, may not be the ideal solution in
improving their lives or the acceptance of industrialization.
It must
be noted that the IPs are protected by Republic Act 8371 (The Indigenous
Peoples Rights Act) of IPRA Law is an act to recognize, protect and promote the
rights of indigenous cultural communities/indigenous peoples. The major
emphasis in the IPRA Law is “free and prior consent” from any IP community on
whatever plans and programs to be instituted by the government or the private
sector within their designated and identified area. Years of exploitation
by the “unats” or lowlanders have made the “kulots” or IPs naturally
distrustful and cynical. Their lack of education has done more harm since
they do not have the training and capacity to understand and internalize things
such as progressive plans and programs. They would rather stay within
their comfort zone… no matter how backward it may seem.
There
really is a basis for some degree of rough-housing in dealing with the
IPs. They are an ignorant and hard-headed lot but understand the meaning
of power especially when it is wielded by the State. But peace and
harmony will never be the order of the day if force is used against the
IPs. The use of violence will only spawn more violence from a people who
feel they are being enslaved and it is their duty, obligation and God-given
right to fight and use violence to defend their homeland. One of the
strongest characteristic of the IPs is their being very territorial.
As a
broad-stroke methodology to approaching the IP problem, the following could
(perhaps) be considered:
First…
Convince by example. Whatever benefits industrialization brings should be
first be experienced and felt by the IPs. For example: good roads,
utilities (electricity and potable water), healthcare, etc.
Second…
Education. Mores, folklore, customs and traditions play a major role in
the lives of the IPs. Education (formal or non-formal) and training
should open their eyes to other possibilities than what they are used to.
Embracing technology and other advances industrialization brings will be easier
to accept when the IPs are willfully aware of such things.
Third…
Developing trust and confidence. Trust and confidence from the IPs could
only be realized when real progress is being experienced by them. “Word
of Honor” is a code they live by and whatever is committed by the “unat” should
become a reality in the timeframe promised. Sincerity is the only tool
that will develop the IPs’ trust and confidence.
The
IPs should be kept in the loop and in the center of all development activities
in the uplands. Besides, most, if not
all, of these development programs are being implemented for them anyway.
Just
my little thoughts…
No comments:
Post a Comment