COAL PLANT IN PALAWAN?
by Anton Antonio
May 30, 2015
The following statement was issued by PACE (Palawan
Alliance for Clean Energy) on the PCSD’s (Palawan Council for Sustainable
Development) approval of the proposed Coal Plant in Palawan:
“We join all of Palawan’s affected communities and civil society in denouncing the action of the Palawan
Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD) to approve the establishment of the
DMCI coal fired power plant, during its meeting on 28 May 2015.
The manner by which the PCSD issued a
Strategic Environmental Plan (SEP) clearance to the thermal plant project
demonstrated this body’s brazen disregard of its core mandate to protect
Palawan’s environment. The PCSD as a permanent regulatory agency surrendered
itself to machinations of local politics, kowtowing to the provincial
governor’s personal dictates.
We denounce the fact that there was no
deliberation or debate at all within the Council as Governor Jose Alvarez held
sway all other local officials including the mayors of Puerto Princesa City and
the municipality of Narra who meekly kept their mouths shut when the resolution
was made.As representatives of communities opposing the coal project, we were
denied our basic clamor to be fairly represented in the decision making
process.
We denounce the fact that even in the
communities where the coal plant is planned to be constructed, there was no
informed participation in the environmental impact assessment process. This
denied community residents unbiased access to information on the coal power
plant project.
We denounce the railroading of the entire
local permitting process from the barangay level to the municipal level and
from the provincial legislature to the PCSD Council. All of these processes
were a mockery of the consultative and participatory processes required under
existing laws, and in direct disregard of PCSD's own procedures. To date, DMCI
has not submitted an Environmental Impact Statement on its project to the ECAN
Board. There was no endorsement from the ECAN Board necessary to facilitate its
endorsement to the PCSD. And finally, the coal option was evaluated but
rejected as too costly under the newly approved Palawan Island Energy
Development Masterplan.
Shocking and disturbing is the governor’s
response that the project no longer needs the endorsement of the ECAN Board and
the approval of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR),and
that he can unilaterally change the energy masterplan. It is alarming that the
highest-ranking public official in the province of Palawan contravenes the
basic tenets of transparency, participation and accountability that our laws
stand for. The Aquino Administration promotes good governance in its fight
against corruption.
We thus call on every Palaweno to send letter-petitions
protesting this mockery of our laws and processes to key national officials,
the provincial governor, to all the government officials who sit in the PCSD,
to the barangay officials of San Isidro, Narra and the municipal officials of
Narra.”
The PACE statement
is certainly an environmental “red flag”.
But more than simply providing agitation, the level of awareness of the
general public must also be addressed by providing information on the ill
effects of coal power plants. People
will better commit to a cause when they are made aware of its importance to
them. It really should be an informed
movement structured on knowledge and belief systems.
Coal has negative
impacts on public health and the environment in general. Burning
coal is a major source of ozone (smog), fine particulate, acid rain, air toxics
and greenhouse gases responsible for global warming. Links have been made
between exposure to pollution from coal-burning power plants and serious health
impacts such as heart disease, respiratory disease and cancer. Burning coal
also contaminates drinking water with mercury and other metals. Hazardous coal
combustion waste (CCW) remains largely under regulated, often disposed of in
unlined pits or old mines where dangerous chemicals like arsenic can leach into
drinking water supplies.
There are numerous damaging environmental impacts of coal that
occur through its mining, preparation, combustion, waste storage, and
transport. This article (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Environmental_impacts_of_coal) provides an overview. Each topic is
explored in greater depth in separate articles, as are several related topics:
·
Acid mine drainage (AMD) refers to the outflow of acidic water from coal mines or
metal mines, often abandoned mines where ore- or coal mining activities have
exposed rocks containing the sulphur-bearing mineral pyrite. Pyrite reacts with
air and water to form sulphuric acid and dissolved iron, and as water washes
through mines, this compound forms a dilute acid, which can wash into nearby
rivers and streams.
·
Air pollution from
coal-fired power plants includes sulphur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, particulate matter (PM), and heavy metals, leading to smog,
acid rain, toxins in the environment, and numerous respiratory, cardiovascular,
and cerebrovascular effects.
·
Air pollution from
coal mines is mainly due to emissions of
particulate matter and gases including methane (CH4), sulphur
dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen oxides (NOx), as well as carbon
monoxide (CO).
·
Climate impacts of
coal plants - Coal-fired power plants are
responsible for one-third of America’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, making
coal a huge contributor to global warming.
Black carbon resulting from incomplete combustion is an additional
contributor to climate change.
·
Coal dust stirred up during the mining process, as well as released during
coal transport, which can cause severe and potentially deadly respiratory
problems.
·
Coal fires occur in both abandoned coal mines and coal waste piles. Internationally, thousands of underground
coal fires are burning now. Global coal
fire emissions are estimated to include 40 tons of mercury going into the
atmosphere annually, and three percent of the world's annual carbon dioxide
emissions.
·
Coal combustion
waste is the nation's second largest waste stream
after municipal solid waste.[9] It is disposed of in landfills or "surface
impoundments," which are lined with compacted clay soil, a plastic sheet,
or both. As rain filters through the toxic ash pits year after year, the toxic
metals are leached out into the local environment.
·
Coal sludge, also known as slurry, is the liquid coal waste generated by washing
coal. It is typically disposed of at
impoundments located near coal mines, but in some cases it is directly injected
into abandoned underground mines. Since
coal sludge contains toxins, leaks or spills can endanger underground and
surface waters
·
Floods such as the Buffalo Creek
Flood caused by mountaintop removal mining and failures of coal mine
impoundments.
·
Forest destruction caused by
mountaintop removal mining - According to a 2010 study, mountaintop
removal mining has destroyed 6.8% of Appalachia’s forests.
·
Greenhouse gas emissions caused by
surface mining - According to a 2010 study, mountaintop removal mining
releases large amounts of carbon through clearcutting and burning of trees and
through releases of carbon in soil brought to the surface by mining operations.
These greenhouse gas emissions amount to
at least 7% of conventional power plant emissions.
·
Loss or degradation of groundwater -
Since coal seams are often serve as underground aquifers, removal of coal beds
may result in drastic changes in hydrology after mining has been completed.
·
Radical disturbance of 8.4 million
acres of farmland, rangeland, and forests, most of which has not been reclaimed.
·
Heavy metals and coal - Coal
contains many heavy metals, as it is created through compressed organic matter
containing virtually every element in the periodic table - mainly carbon, but
also heavy metals. The heavy metal
content of coal varies by coal seam and geographic region. Small amounts of heavy metals can be necessary
for health, but too much may cause acute or chronic toxicity (poisoning). Many of the heavy metals released in the
mining and burning of coal are environmentally and biologically toxic elements,
such as lead, mercury, nickel tin, cadmium, antimony, and arsenic, as well as
radio isotopes of thorium and strontium.
·
Mercury and coal - Emissions
from coal-fired power plants are the largest source of mercury in the
United States, accounting for about 41 percent (48 tons in 1999) of industrial
releases.
·
Methane released by coal mining accounts
for about 10 percent of US releases of methane (CH4), a potent
global warming gas.
·
Mountaintop removal mining and
other forms of surface mining can lead to the drastic alteration of landscapes,
destruction of habitat, damages to water supplies, and air pollution. Not all
of these effects can be adequately addressed through coal mine reclamation.
·
Particulates and coal -
Particulate matter (PM) includes the tiny particles of fly ash and dust
that are expelled from coal-burning power plants. Studies have shown that exposure to
particulate matter is related to an increase of respiratory and cardiac
mortality.
·
Radioactivity and coal - Coal
contains minor amounts of the radioactive elements, uranium and thorium. When
coal is burned, the fly ash contains uranium and thorium "at up to 10
times their original levels."
·
Subsidence - Land subsidence may
occur after any type of underground mining, but it is particularly common in
the case of longwall mining.
·
Sulfur dioxide and coal -
Coal-fired power plants are the largest human-caused source of sulfur dioxide,
a pollutant gas that contributes to the production of acid rain and causes
significant health problems. Coal
naturally contains sulfur, and when coal is burned, the sulfur combines with
oxygen to form sulfur oxides.
·
Thermal pollution from coal plants is
the degradation of water quality by power plants and industrial manufacturers -
when water used as a coolant is returned to the natural environment at a higher
temperature, the change in temperature impacts organisms by decreasing oxygen
supply, and affecting ecosystem composition.
·
Toxins - According to a July 2011
NRDC report, “How Power Plants Contaminate Our Air and States” electricity
generation in the U.S. releases 381,740,601 lbs. of toxic air pollution
annually, or 49% of total national emissions, based on data from the EPA’s
Toxic Release Inventory (2009 data, accessed June 2011). Power plants are the leading sources of toxic
air pollution in all but four of the top 20 states by electric sector
emissions.
·
Transportation - Coal is often
transported via trucks, railroads, and large cargo ships, which release air
pollution such as soot and can lead to disasters that ruin the
environment, such as the Shen Neng 1 coal carrier collision with the Great
Barrier Reef, Australia that occurred in April 2010.
·
Waste coal, also known as
"culm," "gob," or "boney," is made up of unused
coal mixed with soil and rock from previous mining operations. Runoff from
waste coal sites can pollute local water supplies.
·
Water consumption from coal plants -
Power generation has been estimated to be second only to agriculture in being
the largest domestic user of water.
·
Water pollution from coal includes
the negative health and environmental effects from the mining, processing,
burning, and waste storage of coal.
Please
note that the foregoing article is based on coal utilization experiences in the
United States. However, whether in the
US or any part of the world, coal is coal and geography will never change the
ill effects of coal. So why a coal plant
in Palawan?
Just my little thoughts…
(Please visit, like and
share Pro EARTH Crusaders on Facebook or follow me at http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/.)
REFERENCE:
Source Watch (2015). “Environmental impacts of
coal.” Retrieved on May 30, 2015 from http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Environmental_impacts_of_coal
No comments:
Post a Comment