UNDERLYING CAUSES OF THE DEGRADATION OF UPLAND RESOURCES
(Part 1)
by Antonio C. Antonio
December 20, 2014
Most problems in the uplands persist only because they are
not addressed by identified solutions.
It would be ideal to revisit these problems with fresh perspectives in an
effort to find new solutions to those that did not work in the past, such as:
POPULATION GROWTH AND INWARD MIGRATION IN THE UPLANDS – In
many upland areas there is a steadily expanding population from both the
natural growth of the indigenous population and inward migration from the
lowlands. This leads to increasing
pressure on a finite, and often ecologically vulnerable, natural resource
base. The problem is exacerbated where
population growth in taking place at the same as the natural resource base on
which it depends is shrinking, therefore, where land degradation has already
reduced the population of arable, pasture and upland areas within individual
uplands.
POPULATION GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE LOWLANDS –
Continuing population growth in the lowlands has resulted in increased
urbanization and industrial development, with an ever expanding demand for
water, electricity, timber, agricultural crops, and recreation facilities. Meeting this demand may lead to local over
exploitation of upland resources.
Continuing conversion of lowland farm land to non-agricultural uses
(roads, houses, factories, offices, shops, etc.) has forced many farmers to
migrate to the uplands in search of new farm land.
LAND TENURE – Suboptimal use and management of upland
natural resources can largely be explained by the tenure regime under which the
users operate. The more insecure the
user feels with regard to his/her long term rights to use a particular resource,
the more incentive there is to exploit it to the maximum over the short term
without considering its long term sustainability. Land users require long term secure rights to
use a particular piece of land and to harvest the produce from it before they
will invest time and effort in sustaining its long term productivity. Large parts of the upland in the public
domain have become de facto open access resources. As the people using them have no legal or
customary rights (either for cultivation, grazing or for collection of upland
products), there has been no incentive to conserve the productive potential of
their natural resources (soil, water, vegetation, and animal).
POVERTY AND ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE – Poverty is the
underlying cause of much upland degradation within the Philippines. The upland and mountain areas of the country
are generally the poorest and least developed.
The on-site users of upland resources are predominantly rural. Lack of alternative income generating
activities means that most of them are dependent on small-scale farming and/or
forestry activities for their livelihood.
Such “resource-poor” households can rarely afford to forego the chance
of short term production (therefore, growing annual food crops on steep slopes)
even when this is clearly non-sustainable, for the sake of long term
conservation benefits (therefore, planting crops which may not give any
productive returns for several years.
LACK OF MARKETS – Geographic isolation and the lack of well
developed market infrastructure in most upland areas means that agriculture and
forestry activities of upland communities have remained predominantly on the
subsistence level. Opportunities for
increasing cash income are largely restricted to a small number of commodities
that keep well, have high value, or are easily transported. Lack of good roads and markets limits the
scope for promoting the growing of perennial tree crops as an alternative to
annual food crops on steep hill slopes, if the produce is perishable and bulky. Regrettably, this is the case for most of the
fruit tree crops currently promoted in Integrated Social Forestry (ISF) and
Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) programs.
These problems were already identified and reported by the
Forest Management Bureau of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources. Perhaps, you might have
something better than the recommended solutions of the DENR-FMB to the
underlying causes of the degradation of upland resources.
Just my little
thoughts…
(Please visit,
like and share Pro EARTH Crusaders and Landscape Ecology UPOU on Facebook or
follow me at http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/.)
No comments:
Post a Comment