Is This Right?

IS THIS RIGHT?

by Antonio C. Antonio

December 17, 2014

“Greenpeace International set off a firestorm in Peru last week, and not the kind it had hoped for.  After a few of its members damaged, perhaps irreparably, one of the most important cultural heritage sites in the country, a debate is beginning over how to interpret the environmental group’s offensive actions.  Greenpeace’s intention was good, some argue.  It’s not like the whole organization was in on it.  Think of all the other important acts Greenpeace has done in the past, they say.  The climate movement needs Greenpeace.

But others maintain Greenpeace International committed a grave offense.  Its illegal actions illustrated the group’s willingness to disrespect cultural patrimony for the sake of making a headline.  And in a way, its attempt to promote renewable energy may have actually set back that very cause, as political opponents jumped on the story as indicative of a radical and crass organization with no real respect for the environment.

This is the dispute that has preoccupied climate and environmental advocates since it was discovered last week that Greenpeace had trespassed on to the world-renowned Nazca Lines to lay a bright yellow banner urging a switch to renewable energy.  The combination of banner-plus-Peruvian World Heritage site was meant to draw attention to the U.N. climate talks held in nearby Lima.  But the stunt backfired, and Peruvian officials say the activists’ footprints permanently damaged the area surrounding the ancient hummingbird geoglyph.

Along with riling the Peruvian government (which has pledged to file criminal charges against the offending activists) and damaging the site, the situation has drawn a rift between environmentalists.”  (http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/12/16/3603899/greenpeace-nazca-peru-climate-message/)

Environmental science is multidisciplinary and, therefore, covers a wide array of concerns to include culture and the preservation of it.  Niccolo Machiavelli’s famous saying “The end justifies the means.” is not at all applicable in all cases.  Greenpeace International is one of the prime movers of environmentalism in the world… but they should find more acceptable reasons to justify their actions.  They need to ask themselves “Is this right?”

Just my little thoughts…

(Please visit, like and share Pro EARTH Crusaders and Landscape Ecology UPOU on Facebook or follow me at http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/.)