SOMETHING GOOD WILL HAPPEN
by Antonio C. Antonio
November 13, 2014
QUESTION: Looking at
environmental lobbying (in the Philippines? International context?) as a
strategy in environmental advocacy, how have we fared so far?
I would prefer to believe that environmental lobbying as a
strategy in environmental advocacy is workable.
But this is not just a simple gut feel but there are several events that
give credence to the fact that environmental lobbying really works.
In
August 8, 2014 I wrote a blog “Losing Our Lives” (http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/2014/08/losing-our-lives.html)
which narrated how the U.S. Environment Protection Agency ruled on
substantially reducing carbon emission.
“Mitigation might no longer be the prime
strategy since Global Warming and Climate Change is already upon us.” (Antonio,
2013, “Typhoon Yolanda”, http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/2014/04/typhoon-yolanda.html) Typhoon
Yolanda (Haiyan), the most powerful tropical storm ever to make landfall is a prime
indicator of climate change and global warming.
The rise in water level and increase in temperature in the Pacific Ocean
provided a deadly combination of causes that made Typhoon Yolanda a killer that
took the lives of over 8,000 Filipinos in 3 hours of fury. “Yolanda
is a 1st World problem which unfortunately happened to a 3rd World
country. Our government (both national and local), obviously ill-prepared
and ill-equipped to cope with such a disaster, was initially overwhelmed,
shocked and paralyzed. The United States, with all its wealth and power,
also failed to stop Hurricane Katrina which registered 230 KPH winds… Yolanda
was over 250 KPH. If governments (our own and other countries) cannot
stop typhoons, what can ordinary people like us do to stop natural
calamities? Nothing.” (Antonio, 2013. “Typhoon Yolanda”, http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/2014/04/typhoon-yolanda.html)
“The Philippines is
located in the typhoon alley of the Pacific West and is frequently visited by
tropical typhoons… some 28 of them yearly.
Typhoon Yolanda, however, is a class of its own but new studies show
that its strength was a result of global warming. Typhoon Yolanda could have dealt the country
a crippling blow that we cannot cope with without help from other
countries. We, Filipinos, will forever
be grateful to the American people for being one of the first to come to our
aid and rescue in those trying days in November 2013.
Natural disasters
are the business of the Gods which the Gods never meant to cause upon man… but
man has contributed largely in making natural disasters happen. Unrestricted carbon emissions from coal
plants have contributed considerably to green house gases (GHG) and air
pollution.
The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) recently proposed regulations that represent the most
significant measure the United States has ever done to combat climate change
and global warming. The proposed
regulations were designed by the EPA to gradually reduce carbon emissions and
air pollution which may not be significantly felt in the United States but are
wrecking havoc of disastrous proportions to 3rd World countries like
the Philippines with Typhoon Yolanda.
However, last July 31, 2014, members of the United Mine Workers of
America from 12 states (Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, West Virginia, and Wyoming) joined
forces to nullify the EPA’s rules through the court system. They rallied before the D.C. Circuit Court of
Appeals to express their collective grievances mostly revolving around losing
jobs and livelihood opportunities.
The Philippines
and other 3rd World nations pale in comparison to the United States
in terms of economic wealth and power.
It will not be difficult to assume that the US government, because of
its vast resources and the presence of economic development wizards, can whip
up alternative industries and livelihood opportunities for coal mining and
power plant industry workers. We,
Filipinos, have a simple appeal to the United Mine Workers of America… Please
give us a chance to live. While you are
concerned about losing your jobs in a society and country of vast resources and
opportunities, we are a poor people simply concerned about losing our lives.” (http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/2014/08/losing-our-lives.html)
In the recently
concluded Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Beijing, China, the
United States and China announced that they will curb their greenhouse gas
emissions over the next two decades. It
should be noted that these two countries are considered as the world’s largest
economies, the biggest energy consumers and the highest emitters of greenhouse
gases. The U.S. agreed to cut its 2005
level of carbon emissions by 26 to 28% before 2015. On the other hand, China agreed to peak its
carbon emissions by 2030 and will also aim to get 20% of its energy from
zero-carbon emission sources in the same year.
The agreement was signed by President Barack Obama and President Xi
Jinping last November 11, 2014.
Environmental lobbying is defined as the process of putting
pressure on members of the legislature or seeking to influence a
politician or public official to pass bills on an environmental issue or
established public policies on the environment.
The normal targets of environmental lobbying are the elected senators
and congressional district representatives since our legislative branch is
bicameral in structure. Environmental
lobbying with the legislative branch is effective on non-existent public
policies of measure that are still to be passed as bills and enacted into laws
or republic acts. However, lobbying
could also be done with the executive department particularly the department
secretaries especially on laws that still lack the implementing rules and regulations
or are presently being implemented.
Last
November 8, 2014, I posted a blog “Somebody Read My Blog” (http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/2014/11/somebody-read-my-blog.html): “From the
environmental and ecological viewpoints, Philippine urban centers do have so
many problems. I have chosen to write
about the urban problems and solutions of Metro Manila since this is where my
family and I live. As citizens of the
biggest metropolis in the Philippines, we are exposed to its good and bad
environment.” (Antonio, 2014)
In April 29, 2014, I blogged an
article titled “Problems of Philippine Urban Centers” (http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-problems-of-philippine-urban-centers.html). To aid in the analysis of the situation, I
made a matrix. The first was the PROBLEM
COLUMN; the second the CAUSES COLUMN; and, the third the SOLUTIONS COLUMN. The identified PROBLEM was “Air Pollution”,
the identified CAUSE was “Old/Surplus Vehicles”; and, the identified SOLUTIONS
were: “(1) Ban the importation of old and surplus motor vehicles; (2) Ban the
entry of old vehicles into Metro Manila; and, (3) Pay higher motor vehicle
registration fees for old vehicles.”
Last
week, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) came up with a
statement that the level of pollution in Metro Manila is worsening every
day. And to reduce Metro Manila’s carbon
footprint and curb the rapidly deteriorating air quality in the metropolis,
drastic measures had to be made. 70 to
80% of the air pollution in Metropolitan Manila is caused by vehicular
emissions while 20 to 30% come from industrial emissions. "Clearly, the key to improving Metro
Manila's air quality is by addressing the biggest source of pollution, which is
motor vehicles," the DENR pointed out. "We are therefore proposing an
early implementation of the Euro 4 Standards for automobile fuels and the scrapping
of older high-polluting vehicles.” The
DENR proposes to move the implementation of this measure from January 1, 2016
to an earlier date in the month of June 2015.
The
phasing-out of vehicles that have been operating for more than 15 years shall
be done through the Department of Transportation and Communications
(DOTC). If this is strictly followed
next year, this means cars models 2000 and older will be banned from Metro
Manila streets. This will not only
reduce carbon emissions but also effectively reduce the number of vehicles in
the metropolis; therefore, an additional measure to solve the traffic
congestion problem. I understand that
safety nets or support system are also being considered to mitigate the effect
of this measure especially on the transportation sector… details of which are
yet to be made public.
In
April 22, 2014, I wrote another blog titled “The Ripple Principle” (http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-ripple-principle.html)
which essentially says that environmental lobbying could come in the form of
“noise” created in all conceivable media (mainstream or social) outlets by
ordinary citizens like us or even loosely organized pro-environment
groups. The point is simply making
“noise” about our environmental concerns until this “noise” is heard by someone
(or an organization; especially government) who could actually do something
about it. I’m just glad that someone
read my blog.”
Patience
is a virtue in environmental lobbying.
Environmental advocates, activists and lobbyists should be relentless in
the pursuit of their cause. Sooner or
later something good will happen.
Just
my little thoughts…
(Please visit, like and
share Pro EARTH Crusaders and Landscape Ecology UPOU on Facebook or follow me
at http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/.)
No comments:
Post a Comment