TERRESTRIAL
HYDROLOGY
by
Antonio C. Antonio
February
11, 2014
The
image included in this article will give us an idea on the important functions
involved in Terrestrial Hydrology which are as follows:
1. The
forest canopy intercepts rainfall, protects soil and provides shade;
2. The
forest canopy promotes transpiration, nutrient storage and trapping of air
pollutants;
3. The
forest floor functions as a filter for sediment and other chemicals;
4. The
forest floor promotes infiltration and water and nutrient storage; and,
5. Ground
soil functions as a filter to remove biological nutrients and pollutants.
QUESTION: If our watershed
management objective is to produce as much water as possible, do you think
reducing the number of trees and replacing them with small trees and bushes
will help? Why or why not?
ANSWER:
My
answer to this question is based largely on the experiences of the forest
management company I worked for.
Part
of sustainable forest management is a program called “Timber Stand Improvement”
or TSI. In the company I used to work
for, I would often grill our technical staff (our foresters) on the benefits
and cost justification of this program.
I always argue that “we should not fix anything that is not broken” as I
(from a layman’s viewpoint) didn’t see anything wrong with the forest within
our area of operation. It was in one of
these meetings with the foresters that one of them mentioned that “TSI will improve
terrestrial hydrology”… a term strange to me then as it was the first time I
heard of it. They went on to say that
TSI will increase the water-bearing capacity of the ground which will guarantee
continuous growth of trees even during the dry season.
TSI,
I should also mention, does not necessarily mean felling or harvesting of
trees. It only entails clearing of
unwanted branches (the canopy) through pruning and brushing of the forest
floor… but, none-the-less, an expense item which was my only concern (from the
purely business management standpoint) considering the wide area where TSI
would have to be implemented. But, then,
who am I to argue on the merits of the forester’s professional opinion… when my
job was to make sure that the necessary funds are made available for the TSI
program.
Using
the borrowed knowledge I have, I should say that replacing trees with smaller
ones and bushes will not support a watershed management plan to possibly
produce as much water. The TSI program
specifically calls for canopy clearing and forest floor clearing as well. Replacing trees with smaller ones is not also
part of the deal. I will just have to
trust our foresters on this one (their contention that this will increase the
water-bearing capacity of the forest) as I cannot intelligently justify my
argument for now. In the meantime, I
really should indulge in more research and study of terrestrial hydrology.
Just
my little thoughts…
REFERENCES:
(Visit,
like and share Pro Earth Crusaders and Landscape Ecology UPOU on Facebook or
follow me at http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/)
No comments:
Post a Comment