SEA LEVEL RISE (Part 2)
By Anton Antonio
October 16, 2015
Disciples of environmental science are often branded as
doomsday loudmouths whenever they talk about global warming and climate
change. But who can blame these people
who put so much effort in studying, researching and analyzing environmental
patterns in the last few decades. Let’s
take the “sea level rise” issue for example.
Here is a researched material on this subject matter…
“SEA LEVEL RISE WILL SWALLOW MIAMI, NEW ORLEANS – STUDY…
Making extreme carbon cuts and moving to renewable energy
could save millions of people living in iconic coastal areas of the United
States, according to a new study.
MIAMI, United States – Say goodbye to Miami and New
Orleans. No matter what we do to curb
global warming, these and other beloved US cities will sink below rising seas,
according to a study Monday, October 12.
But making extreme carbon cuts and moving to renewable energy could save
millions of people living in iconic coastal areas of the United States, said
the findings in the October 12 edition of the Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, a peer-reviewed US journal. Scientists have already established that if
we do nothing to reduce our burning of fossil fuel to the year 2100, the planet
will face sea level rise of 14-32 feet (4.3-9.9 meters), said lead author Ben
Strauss, vice president for sea level and climate impacts at Climate Central. The big uncertainty is the issue of
when. “Some of this could happen as
early as next century,” Strauss told the Agence France-Presse. “But it might also take many centuries,” he
added. “Just think of a pile of ice in a
warm room. You know it is going to melt,
but it is harder to say how quickly.” To
bring this issue home for people in the United States, the study pinpoints
at-risk land where more than 20 million people reside. The authors projected business-as-usual
carbon emissions, in addition to the complication of the melting West Antarctic
ice sheet, a process some experts fear is irreversible. They also considered what might happen if the
world were to make a big turnaround, reaching peak carbon emissions by
2020. This radical scenario would have
to occur far earlier than the current aim of some world powers to peak by 2050,
said Strauss. An online tool at http://choices.climatecentral.org
allows users to see the impacts on various US cities. A global version is expected in the next
month, Strauss said. The tool shows
which US cities may face “lock-in dates beyond which the cumulative effects of
carbon emissions likely commit them to long-term sea level rise that could
submerge land under more than half of the city’s population,” said the
study. “Norfolk, Virginia, for example,
faces a lock-in date of 2045 under a scenario of unabated carbon
emissions.” For cities like Miami and
New Orleans, the limits are already exceeded.
“In our analysis, a lot of cities have futures that depend on our carbon
choices but some appear to be already lost,” Strauss said. “And it is hard to imagine how we could
defend Miami in the long run.” Miami’s
low elevation and porous limestone foundation mean that sea walls and levees will
not help, he said. The state of Florida
has the most number of big cities at risk from sea level rise, holding 40
percent or more of the US population living on potentially affected land. After Florida, the nest three most affected
states are California, Louisiana and New York.
One beloved American city, New Orleans, home to jazz music and some of
the nation’s most beloved cuisine, is already sinking. “New Orleans is a really sad story,” Strauss
said. “It is a lot worse looking than
Miami.” New York is also in peril, and
under a worst-case scenario, the city could be consigned to an un-liveable
future by the year 2085, according to the study. But strong action – the kind that would
reduce carbon emissions in the year 2050 to levels that more closely resemble
those seen in 1950 – could make a difference.
A total of 14 cities with more than 100,000 residents could avoid
locking in this century, including Jacksonville, Florida; Chesapeake, Norfolk,
and Virginia Beach in Virginia; and Sacramento and Stockton in California. “We were really trying to show what the
consequences of our carbon choices are going to be,” said Strauss, whose study
was co-authored by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany
and edited by renowned NASA climate scientist and author James Hansen. According to earth scientist Michael Mann, a
well-known author on climate change, the latest findings are a “useful
contribution to the literature.” The
study provides a “better quantification of the detriment impacts of the
magnitude of sea level rise we may commit to in the decades ahead if we
continue with business-as-usual policies of fossil fuel burning,” said Mann,
who was not involved in the research.” --- Kerry Sheridan, AFP/Rappler.com
The findings of environmental scientists and experts as
reported in the October 12 edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, a peer-reviewed US journal, are not plain doomsday prophecies but
backed by scientific studies and extensive historical data. These, however, do not come as ultra negativism
but also with plausible solutions such as reducing fossil fuel emission to pre-industrial
revolution levels.
If the most advanced economy (the United States) in the
world is worried, one could just imagine what will happen in the Philippines
which is a archipelago. How do we really
deal with sea level rise?
Thoughts to
promote positive action…
(Please
visit, like and share Pro EARTH Crusaders on Facebook or follow me at http://antonantonio.blogspot.com/
and http://twitter.com/EarthCrusader/)
REFERENCE:
Rappler.com, (2015).
“Sea Level Rise Will Swallow US Cities”.
Retrieved on October 16, 2015 from http://www.rappler.com/science-nature/environment/109075-sea-level-rise-swallow-us-cities-study?utm_content=buffer56873&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
No comments:
Post a Comment